The other night I went to see A.R. Gurney’s Off-Broadway play, “Buffalo Gal,” which is a wonderful show about the staging of a production of Anton Checkov’s “The Cherry Orchard.” Well, it’s about much more than that, but as I watched the play I realized, with some degree of shame, that I have never actually read or seen, "The Cherry Orchard", and, as I am planning to interview Mr. Gurney for my radio show, IN HOUSE, I decided I would order a copy of the play from Amazon. I went to the Amazon page and out of curiosity, I scrolled down to the customer reviews.
My novel, Outtakes From a Marriage came out in June, and I admit, I still pay a call to Amazon once or twenty times a day. My book’s Amazon ranking has inevitably climbed and the comments have sort of fizzled out, but I still get a review every now and then, and when I do get a kind review, I'm not exaggerating, my eyes actually well up with tears of gratitude. It blows my mind that people will take time out of their busy lives to praise (or even semi-praise) my book. While my customer reviews have been mostly favorable, I have received a few zingers, like this one:
don’t waste your time or money, (2-stars) June 28, 2008
I bought this book after seeing the author several times (toting around her famous husband on talk shows)
I couldn't have been more bored..ann leary is not funny or smart as the blurbs had led me to believe. The story was tedious (so hard to feel bad for the tragedies that happen to rich white people)
This stung. I wanted to write the reviewer back and ask her if she had seen my starred review from Kirkus (notoriously hard on authors) and my other favorable editorial reviews. I wanted to ask her if she knew how laborious and exhausting it was toting that famous husband here and there. But I didn’t. I just felt awful. I felt sick, really. I want everybody to love me and think I’m perfect - is that too much to ask?.
So, I admit, it cheered me to discover that even our literary giants can be dragged over the coals by Amazon’s discerning judges. Here is a review of Checkov’s "The Cherry Orchard":
A dreadful play (1-star) February 10, 2004
"The Cherry Orchard" is an atrocious play. If we hold this play in high regard, then we dramatist's need to reevaluate our standards. Chekhov wrote a play that will make you not care an inch about the character's or their situation(s). For him to think that this is a comedy makes you wonder if he understood the point he himself was trying to make. The characters are pathetic and they'll make you pity them - not because of their predicaments, but because of whom they are. I do not recommend.
Wow. Harsh. I decided to see what reviewers thought of some of my favorite classics. Here’s what one reader thought of Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises:
A story about immoral alcoholics, July 28, 2008
My main beef with this book was that no one was likable AT ALL. They were all a bunch of morally-bankrupt, selfish and snobby rich Americans who trot all over Europe satisfying their whims and drinking themselves into oblivion, all while imposing their disgusting lives on other people.(Autobiographical?) If you took out every reference to how drunk these people got, this would be a 50-page novella. You might say, "That's what Hemingway was trying to portray". OK, in that sense this was a powerful book because the characters' pathetic lives were so vividly impressed upon my mind. Perhaps. However, I could never recommend this novel for the very subject matter and tone of the novel. Hemingway's writing is, simply put, bizarre. He translates Spanish syntax anad phrasing into English, which results in awkward-sounding phrases and his descriptive abilities are marginal. I would pass on this one.
I usually try not to take pleasure in the misfortune of others, especially dead others, but I couldn’t help feeling a little pleased about Papa Hemingway’s disastrous review. I mean, at least nobody has criticized my syntax and phrasing (yet). Too bad he didn’t live to read this review, perhaps he could have become one of America’s great writers.
I searched for Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment, and was equally tickled by this stern comeuppance by a disappointed reader :
Good try, but still singular immature approach, June 23, 2008
Granted, Crime and Punishment is considered great literature devoted to the psychology of criminals and their imprisonments within their own guilt. However, the novel is an immature way of stereotyping criminals and simplifying a very complex human puzzle.
My personal favorite, however, was this review of D.H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterly’s Lover, which received one dismal star:
Didn't make it pass the 16th page, July 25, 2008
I wasted my money and time on this book. It was a painful read. It was boring, dry and not very entertaining. How in the world did this book get turned into a movie. I hope the movie is a lot better than the book. I will find out.
How in the world DID Lady Chatterly’s Lover get made into a movie? Clearly some studio nitwit thought this painfully dull read could be transformed into a watchable movie. Why? When there are wonderful books like the Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants to adapt?
These reviews are real. I cut and pasted them so all the spelling and grammar mistakes are real too. I guess my point is, if you're ever feeling down about a poor performance review at your job, a bad review of your acting, writing or art, just log onto Amazon - it's truly a jungle out there.