We have a winner of the Leary Award for Worst Poetry (or the “Tim” as it’s known in literary circles)!
But before the lucky winner is announced, I’d like to thank Phil Holland, because, as you will see, he did not take his task lightly, but instead devoted a great deal of time to the contest and not only judged the poems, but offered some careful analysis. Phil teaches English Classics (I think) at a University (I’m pretty sure), so he knows his stuff, but, as you will see he’s also very, very funny in a dry, professorial way, which is always sexy in my book. Plus, he gave several notable mentions in the runners-up category, which I love.
So, without further ado, here’s Mr. Holland’s verdict:
__________________________________________________________
Looks like Ann touched a nerve. Or opened a vein. In any case, a lot of verse flowed out. And now the native are restless for judgment. Don’t you have taxes to do or anything like that? Or classes to teach?
Now, Ann set this up as a bad, or rather dumb poetry contest. Just to remind you: “I think we should have ourselves a dumb poetry contest in honor of Moses’s delightful friend.” (One of the dummies on his porch, not me). This happens to be a recognized poetic category. There is even a famous anthology of bad poetry called The Stuffed Owl. The editors (DB Wyndham Lewis and Charles Lee) state in their introduction that “Bad Verse has its canons, like Good Verse. There is bad Bad Verse and good Bad Verse. It has been the preoccupation of the compilers to include in this book chiefly good Bad Verse.” Is that clear? Ann’s poem to Sailor was a fine example of such verse, actually, but she is out of the running. Old Sailor could go into an anthology called Knackered Horses, though.
So, the Leary for the Best Dumb Poem goes to…
Hold on, not so fast. We haven’t had the nominees, we haven’t even talked about the art of bad verse yet. Don’t be gettin’ ready to thank the aunt who recited Rod McKuen to you as a child, or Henry Gibson, just yet.
First, let’s review the entries! (I’m taking them from the top in the last two days).
Catherine E’s (Cat’s) poem about buying underwear for her nephew was probably the first ever written on such a subject. And it contained the phrase “package huggers” — very bad (good). Nice work, Cat. Nominated!
Meg wrote a lovely little appreciation of Ann’s blog — too lovely (that’s bad, in our inverted universe).
Christine, who spoke for the “poetry-challenged”, proceed to reel off 8 neat little stanzas — too neat (well done!).
Lisa’s another one who wrote a fine poem (yes, too fine to win! — though you did rhyme “later” and “seder”, as Alan noted, and “bobsled bound” was so original it hurt).
Candy, was that just a comment or a haiku? I’m referring to:
I am a Lemon drop tini girl myself,
Lisa very moving poem.
Off to yoga and then more yard work.
Just a comment, I think, but close to a “found poem”.
Arliss, you’ve got talent! I quote:
Linda M., you touch my heart
with your salute to canine rescue
Aislinn, your wit’s unmatched
l like a rose among the fescue.
That’s too good to be bad! At least by my standards, which incline to the same kind of rhyming.
Bev, was this a haiku too?
I am laying down with a bag of ice to the head….
some of you will know why…………
hehehehehe
OK, I lineated it, but it’s the sequence that counts, and the rhythm of those “he”s
Mary Lynn’s Las Vegas poem — don’t you understand, it’s supposed to be dumb verse, not clever verse ending in a line like “Welcome to Las Vegas, we can’t wait until you leave.”
Jennifer (von Flavorbank?)’s got a kicker too in “Men & Mojitos”. I notice that was written just after midnight. And one too many mojitos. Or men.
Barbara tried an acrostic (I’ve written a few in my time), a nice blog tribute (yes, too nice).
Amanda, that was dumb all right — and contained the Best (Worst) Pun (”dairy-air”) of all.
Guadelupe, Frost wrote some fine doggerel verse (actually a wonderful poem about a stray dog named Gus), which is not really doggerel, though it has short rhyming lines. I see G. wrote a sweet tribute poem of her own on the following day, very nice.
Tammy dwells on Ann’s TMZ spill, now beyond immortality. “The existing of a car” is also hard to beat (for “exiting”?).
Helena’s limerick about Ann’s burned eggs has the ring of good bad poetry. The scansion is a little rough at the end — is that a good or bad thing?
Lisa M. claims to be no poet, but she was moved to write a moving poem on the fate of an adopted “rescue dog”. Even though it contains the phrase “oh to be flea free!”, it’s too heartfelt to win as a dumb poem. It makes a dumb animal speak, though.
Mary Lynn, you again, “Trololololooza!” — will not win. But I see that’s not your official entry.
Tammy, I read your poem about your friend’s loss, and now it’s hard to get back in the mood for silly verse.
Actually, Jonah Gibson comes to the rescue, because he wrote a polished and clever poem about diet and exercise. This is good stuff! It’s all good, but the conclusion especially (in case you missed it):
Running, rowing, dance aerobic, pumping iron, and skipping ropic,
Swimming climbing, step and stretching, jogging to the point of retching—
Till weary rapture of corpuscle coursing through sore, aching muscle
Signals that this hard persistence barely lengthened our existence.
Then free from guilt but full of pain we pause to calculate our gain,
And find when appetite’s denied that all life’s fruits are froze and dried,
And though we may have added years, they’ll have to be reviewed through tears.
Oh, we can choose long life to live, knowing we’ve but one to give,
But racking life out to its limit surely leaves scant living in it.
I wouldn’t call it dumb poetry though (except for a couple of those doggerel rhymes). It may have to get some kind of prize, however. A nomination!
Kathy, that was a strange haiku (like you said). Alan, yours is nominated! here it is for those who missed it:
I already have
Ann’s An Innocent, A Broad.
I want the other.
Colleen made me laugh with her witty lines about her “dim wit”. I see what she means about absurd couplet about the fricassee. That went LOL for me.
KC, “Babies and Books” is better (worse?) than you think. Reading to geese? Mounting a prize fighter? All in one poem? That’s unusual.
Cynthia, what picture? Did Ann post your picture? Sounds like she stole your identity, too.
Suzanne, good poem (yes, too good).
Aislinn, that’s a good bad one (”Free”), a contender. “Three Oak Bar ashtrays, all in taupe.” Now that’s good bad poetry: nominated.
(April 11). Mary Lynn, you’re all over the place. I can’t keep your official self separate from your (’stinkin’ up the joint’) unofficial one. Ah, there it is, the one where you demand Ann’s book. Pretty good bad poem! (even on second reading). You’re a little crazy, though, aren’t you. good crazy, not bad crazy (though didn’t se say bad was good)? Nominated.
Yes, I am really in Greece (at a safe distance, you know). Safe from Bev, for example. And Mary Lynn with her strange obsessions. She has a bit of the stalker in her, no? At least according to her poem about the wolf that got away. She’s got a good ear (probably two of them). Good poem (too good)!
Barbara, I had to face real students yesterday (and today), but your grades are coming (by dinnertime).
Wow, reading all these comments, you’re right, I had no idea. I do like pesto-crusted mahi-mahi, though, Aislinn. No, don’t send any, please!
Cat, do you really think so? But don’t think I’m susceptible to flattery. Really?
You’re all getting (past) impatient, aren’t you. I’m running out of steam to comment on any more verses.
So, let’s review the nominations:
Cat
Jonah
Alan
Aislinn
Mary Lynn
The envelope, please. (Remember, the key word is “dumb”!) Are you sure you want the Leary in this category? No shame, eh?
The award goes to: Cat (Catherine E.) for her poem about purchasing underwear for her 16-year-old nephew!
I’m exhausted. Maybe this wasn’t the best way to make new friends, either. I loved the unpretentious wit of all the poems and comments, though, worthy of Mother Ann (the mover and shaker of this competition).
Keep those verses coming!
Bye now,
Phil



![image[1]](http://annleary.com/blog/files/2010/02/image1-300x248.jpg)

After she gave her babies a snack and licked them all clean, she was much more relaxed and allowed me to hold them. I want to go back and take some better photos and maybe we can help Charlotte place these gorgeous pups in wonderful homes.







Subscribe
